🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move is a clear response by the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in local state media, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in European nations are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such assets can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that if you do all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."